Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 229 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
Chrysler Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Voyager engine produces 32 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 59 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.4 | |
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Volkswagen Sharan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 395 percent more cases than Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Sharan quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 6.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |