Chrysler Voyager 1999 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 14 HP more power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Chrysler Neon. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.0 | |
|
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 37 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 21 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 37 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Voyager has 86 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |