Chrysler Voyager 1996 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 151 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 1 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 40 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 13 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |