Chrysler Voyager 1996 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 151 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Voyager engine produces 31 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Voyager consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Voyager could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is larger. Chrysler Voyager is 46 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 22 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Chrysler Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |