Chrysler Voyager 1991 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler Voyager is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes Vito can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.3 | 2.3 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 - 163 HP | 98 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 179 - 260 NM | 210 - 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 - 16 seconds | 12.7 - 20.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 13.0 | 8.8 - 13.8 | |
|
Chrysler Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes Vito. On average, Chrysler Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is smaller. Chrysler Voyager is 14 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes Vito. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`511 | ~ 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
| |