Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.3 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 180 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 - 360 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 14.1 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 12.7 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Chrysler Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Chrysler Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Chrysler Voyager is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Voyager has 50 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |