Chrysler Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.3 | 2.5 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 180 HP | 130 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 218 - 360 NM | 224 - 324 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 14.1 seconds | 13.8 - 16.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 12.7 | 8.2 - 12.4 | |
Chrysler Voyager petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Carnival. On average, Chrysler Voyager equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.93 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
Chrysler Voyager is 12 cm shorter than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 302 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3320 litres | |
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Voyager has 138 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. The Kia Carnival may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Voyager is 1.5 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 2`590 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |