Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Opel Tigra 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 53 HP more power than Opel Tigra, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Opel Tigra. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 6.1 | |
|
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Tigra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 645 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is larger. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 37 cm longer than the Opel Tigra, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 440 litres | |
|
Opel Tigra has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler PT Cruiser has 40 litres less trunk space than the Opel Tigra. This could mean that the Chrysler PT Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1.3 metres more than that of the Opel Tigra, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Opel Tigra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Opel Tigra, so Opel Tigra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Opel Tigra has
| |