Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 42 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Spider, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Alfa Romeo Spider. Due to the lower power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.1 | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Spider is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Alfa Romeo Spider gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 10 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Spider, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 235 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider has more luggage space. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 25 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Spider. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider has
| |