Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Honda S2000 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Honda S2000 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 97 HP less power than Honda S2000, but torque is 12 NM more than Honda S2000. Due to the lower power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.9 | |
|
The Chrysler PT Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda S2000, which means that by driving the Chrysler PT Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler PT Cruiser) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Honda S2000) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.28 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Honda S2000, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 143 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 67 litres more trunk space than the Honda S2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Honda S2000, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Honda S2000 has
| |