Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Opel Astra 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 223 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 332 NM | 262 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 23 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
500 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.41 m | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 19 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 205 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 440 litres | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has 5 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Astra, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`975 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Opel Astra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Opel Astra has
| |