Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 223 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 332 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 38 HP more power than Alfa Romeo Spider, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Alfa Romeo Spider. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.2 | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Alfa Romeo Spider gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 10 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Spider, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 235 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider has more luggage space. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 25 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Spider. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Alfa Romeo Spider has
| |