Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 vs Volvo C70 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo C70 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 20 HP less power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Volvo C70. Due to the lower power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 262 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo C70. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`000 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo C70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Volvo C70, so Volvo C70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |