Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Seat Leon 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 223 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 332 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 73 HP more power than Seat Leon, whereas torque is 132 NM more than Seat Leon. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Leon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Leon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 500 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Leon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Leon 2005 2.0 engine: 2.0 FSI engine, part of the EA827 family, features a lightweight aluminum block with cast-iron liners and a unique timing system. A toothed belt drives the exhaust camshaft, while the intake camshaft is driven by a single-row chain, which also integrates with the variable valve timing mechanism. The timing regulator is ... More about Seat Leon 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 3 cm shorter than the Seat Leon, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 341 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler PT Cruiser has 197 litres more trunk space than the Seat Leon. The Seat Leon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Seat Leon, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Leon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Seat Leon, so Seat Leon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Seat Leon has
| |