Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Audi A6 1997
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 223 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 332 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 58 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Chrysler PT Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 500 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Audi A6 1997 2.4 engine: Engines is considered quite reliable. It features a cast-iron cylinder block and a timing system driven by a toothed belt, which operates only the camshafts for the exhaust valves. The intake valves are ... More about Audi A6 1997 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 51 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 551 litres | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser has 13 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Audi A6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A6, so Audi A6 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Audi A6 has
| |