Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Kia Ceed 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 223 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 332 NM | 186 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 80 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 146 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
500 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Kia Ceed 2007 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Kia Ceed 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 198 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |