Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Fiat Stilo 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler PT Cruiser) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Fiat Stilo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 223 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 332 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 103 HP more power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 630 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 500 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 370 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 168 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Stilo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Stilo, so Fiat Stilo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |