Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Fiat Stilo 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler PT Cruiser) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Fiat Stilo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 23 HP more power than Fiat Stilo, but torque is 60 NM less than Fiat Stilo. Despite the higher power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 5.4 | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 705 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 370 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 168 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Stilo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Stilo, so Fiat Stilo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |