Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 121 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 engine produces 29 HP more power than Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002, which means that by driving the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 57 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
790 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.42 m | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 is 10 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 is 18 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |