Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Audi A6 1997
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 40 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 1160 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 51 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 551 litres | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser has 13 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Audi A6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi A6, so Audi A6 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Audi A6 has
| |