Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Suzuki Liana 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 60 HP more power than Suzuki Liana, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Suzuki Liana. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.3 | |
|
The Suzuki Liana is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Suzuki Liana gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is larger. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 6 cm longer than the Suzuki Liana, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1.1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Liana, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Suzuki Liana has
| |