Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2005
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 14 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 14 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler PT Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Chrysler PT Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler PT Cruiser has 128 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |