Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Kia Cerato 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 48 HP more power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Kia Cerato. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 5 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 228 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1046 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler PT Cruiser has 310 litres more trunk space than the Kia Cerato. The Kia Cerato may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |