Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Kia Ceed 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 10 HP more power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 5 NM less than Kia Ceed. Despite the higher power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 198 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Kia Ceed, so Kia Ceed quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |