Chrysler PT Cruiser 2005 vs Seat Altea 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Altea is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 7 HP less power than Seat Altea, but torque is 14 NM more than Seat Altea. Due to the lower power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 8.4 | |
|
The Seat Altea is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Altea, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Seat Altea gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.57 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 cm longer than the Seat Altea, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Altea. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Altea has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Seat Altea, so Seat Altea quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Seat Altea has
| |