Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 7 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler PT Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler PT Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 34 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 32 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Chrysler PT Cruiser has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Chrysler PT Cruiser, so Chrysler PT Cruiser quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |