Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 engine produces 29 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 is larger, but lower. Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 is 10 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 538 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |