Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 vs Kia Cerato 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 19 HP more power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Kia Cerato. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Hyundai Matrix | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 228 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1046 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |