Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 vs Honda Civic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 16 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite the higher power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.3 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 7 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 835 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Honda Civic has
| |