Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002 vs Fiat Stilo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 6 HP more power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Despite the higher power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 14 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Stilo, so Chrysler PT Cruiser quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |