Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 151 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 11 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Despite less power, Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.6 | |
|
The Chrysler PT Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler PT Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Eclipse, Chrysler Sebring | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 44 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Chrysler PT Cruiser has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Chrysler PT Cruiser, so Chrysler PT Cruiser quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |