Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Kia Cerato 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 35 HP more power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Kia Cerato. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Eclipse, Chrysler Sebring | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 5 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 228 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1046 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |