Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Fiat Stilo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 37 HP more power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Stilo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Eclipse, Chrysler Sebring | Used also on Fiat Doblo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler PT Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Stilo, so Chrysler PT Cruiser quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |