Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Fiat Stilo 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler PT Cruiser engine produces 45 HP more power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Fiat Stilo. Thanks to more power Chrysler PT Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler PT Cruiser could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler PT Cruiser consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Stilo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`000 kg | 1`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Stilo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Fiat Stilo, so Fiat Stilo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |