Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Renault Megane 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 223 HP | 105 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 332 NM | 151 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | 8.7 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 10.4 | 5.7 - 8.4 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 7 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 490 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler PT Cruiser has 20 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Renault Megane has
| |