Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Honda S2000 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Honda S2000 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is available with front wheel drive, while Honda S2000 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 223 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 332 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 10.4 | 9.9 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda S2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.28 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Honda S2000, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 143 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 67 litres more trunk space than the Honda S2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Honda S2000, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Honda S2000 has
| |