Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 vs Opel Astra 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 223 HP | 105 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 - 332 NM | 150 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | 8.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 10.8 | 6.1 - 9.5 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Astra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 19 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 440 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.8 metres more than that of the Opel Astra, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`923 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Opel Astra has
| |