Chrysler PT Cruiser 2004 vs Chrysler Sebring 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 223 HP | 141 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 - 332 NM | 188 - 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | 9.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 - 10.8 | 9.1 - 10.2 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Sebring. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 63 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |