Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is available only with front wheel drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.1 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is smaller. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler PT Cruiser has 128 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |