Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Nissan Note 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 68 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 128 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 10.7 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.1 | 5.1 - 7.0 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is larger. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 21 cm longer than the Nissan Note, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 258 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Note. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`576 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Nissan Note has
| |