Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Kia Ceed 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 137 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 10.3 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.1 | 4.7 - 7.7 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 198 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`778 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |