Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Honda Civic 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.3 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 83 - 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 119 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 6.6 - 14.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.1 | 5.9 - 9.1 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 53 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Honda Civic has
| |