Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Fiat Stilo 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Fiat Stilo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 95 - 120 HP | |
Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 128 - 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 10.9 - 12.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.1 | 5.4 - 7.0 | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Stilo. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.25 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.48 m | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 370 litres | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 168 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Fiat Stilo, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`133 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |