Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Citroen C4 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 90 - 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 133 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 10.1 - 14.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.1 | 4.5 - 8.1 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 2 cm longer than the Citroen C4, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1023 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 218 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |