Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is available only with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Trax can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 115 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 155 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 9.6 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.1 | 4.5 - 6.5 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Trax. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.67 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 538 litres | 356 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Chrysler PT Cruiser has 182 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`863 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |