Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Peugeot 206 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 60 - 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 94 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 9.3 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 10.5 | 4.4 - 7.9 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is larger. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 29 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 313 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1365 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |