Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Audi A3 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 90 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 145 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 7.5 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 10.5 | 4.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 17 cm longer than the Audi A3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi A3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi A3 has
| |