Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 1981
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.8 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 60 - 139 HP | |
Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 93 - 168 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 8 - 14.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 10.5 | 7.1 - 8.8 | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Scirocco. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.63 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.29 m | |
Chrysler PT Cruiser is larger. Chrysler PT Cruiser is 27 cm longer than the Volkswagen Scirocco, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 26 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 415 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1195 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means Chrysler PT Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`245 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has
| |