Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000 vs Seat Altea 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 223 HP | 85 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 332 NM | 130 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | 7.7 - 14.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 10.5 | 5.4 - 8.4 | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Altea. On average, Chrysler PT Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Altea. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
| Chrysler PT Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Seat Altea, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler PT Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 409 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler PT Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Altea. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`000 | ~ 1`364 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
|
Seat Altea has
| |