Chrysler Neon 1994 vs Chrysler Neon 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 133 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 177 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Chrysler Neon 1994 and Chrysler Neon 1999 have the same engine power, but Chrysler Neon 1994 torque is 2 NM less than Chrysler Neon 1999. Chrysler Neon 1994 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.8 | |
The Chrysler Neon 1994 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Neon 1994 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon 1999, which means that by driving the Chrysler Neon 1994 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
Chrysler Neon 1999 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
Chrysler Neon 1994 is 3 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon 1999, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler Neon 1994 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 370 litres | |
Chrysler Neon 1994 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Neon 1999. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Neon 1994 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon 1999. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Neon has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |